Skip to main content

Soto v. State

Citations

  • 874 So. 2d 1215
  • 2004 WL 1103296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that continued protestation of innocence should not be a factor in sentencing
  • holding that continued protestation of innocence should not be a factor in sentencing
  • holding that defendant’s protestation of innocence and unwillingness to admit guilt were impex-missi-ble considerations for sentencing, and that a trial court’s statements indicating consideration of those factors required reversal for resentencing before another judge
  • holding that continued protestation of innocence should not be a factor in sentencing
  • stating that “continued protestations of innocence and unwillingness to admit guilt should not be factors taken into consideration by a court in sentencing a defendant”
  • “[Continued protestations of innocence, and unwillingness to admit guilt should not be factors taken into consideration by a court in sentencing a defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goderich, Green, and Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.