Ninth Circuit· 2/24/1989
Ripplinger v. Collins
Citations
- 868 F.2d 1043
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing reasonableness of the plaintiffs fear of prosecution “at the time of filing [of the] lawsuit”
- “abstention is inappropriate for eases where statutes are justifiably attacked on their face as abridging free expression” (citations and quotations omitted)
- indictment of five other individuals under the new obscenity statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Porter v. JonesNinth Circuit· 2003-02-06· cited 432×
- Wolfson v. BrammerNinth Circuit· 2010-08-13· cited 317×
- Courthouse News Service v. Michael PlanetNinth Circuit· 2014-04-07· cited 158×
- American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. RenoNinth Circuit· 1995-11-08· cited 121×
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., United States of America v. Rubin GottesmanNinth Circuit· 1992-12-16· cited 82×
- Courthouse News Service v. Michael PlanetNinth Circuit· 2020-01-17· cited 74×
- Blair v. ShanahanNinth Circuit· 1994-10-31· cited 72×
- San Diego County Gun Rights Committee v. RenoNinth Circuit· 1996-10-22· cited 61×
- Martin H. Droz v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceNinth Circuit· 1995-06-01· cited 58×
- William B. Melugin v. Lloyd F. Hames, CommissionerNinth Circuit· 1994-10-25· cited 57×
- Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official EnglishNinth Circuit· 1995-10-05· cited 50×
- Pershing Park Villas Homeowners Ass'n v. United Pacific InsuranceNinth Circuit· 2000-07-10· cited 39×
- Smelt v. County of OrangeNinth Circuit· 2006-05-05· cited 37×
- Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionNinth Circuit· 2000-08-04· cited 37×
- Lind v. GrimmerNinth Circuit· 1994-07-22· cited 26×
- State v. EvensonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-10-30· cited 17×
- Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official EnglishNinth Circuit· 1994-12-07· cited 13×
- Comite De Jornaleros De Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo BeachNinth Circuit· 2010-06-09· cited 10×
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. LockyerC.D. California· 2002-09-16· cited 10×
- San Diego County Gun Rights Committee v. RenoS.D. California· 1995-05-17· cited 6×
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 9,657×
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 6,491×
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 3,480×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 2,897×
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 2,418×
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 2,256×
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 2,188×
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court· 1986-04-21· cited 2,104×
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,863×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,818×
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 1,516×
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 1,459×
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court· 1967-12-05· cited 1,325×
- Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,283×
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1960-06-13· cited 1,258×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.