Skip to main content
· 12/16/1992

United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., United States of America v. Rubin Gottesman

Citations

  • 982 F.2d 1285
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10050
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 16843
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that definition of “sexually explicit conduct” set forth in prior ver- sion of 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2) survived vagueness and over- breadth challenges
  • stating that applying mens rea to this element would be “judicial rewriting of [the] statute”
  • stating that applying mens rea to this element would be “judicial rewriting of [the] statute”
  • striking down § 2252 for failure to include a scienter requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Kozinski, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.