Dixon v. City of Jacksonville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restating that construction of written instruments is reviewed de novo
• explaining “[i]t is well established that the construction of statutes, ordinances, contracts, or other written instruments is a question of law that is reviewable de novo, unless their meaning is ambiguous.”
• \It is well established that the construction of statutes ... is a question of law that is reviewable de novo \
• \It is well established that the construction of statutes ... is a question of law that is reviewable de novo.\
• “It is well established that a development order shall be consistent with the government body’s objectives, policies, land uses, etc., as provided in its comprehensive plan.”
• “It is well established that the construction of statutes, ordinances, contracts, or other written instruments is a question of law that is reviewable de novo, unless their meaning is ambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).