Skip to main content

Richardson v. State

Citations

  • 28 Fla. 349

Syllabus

<p>1. The testimony used on a trial in a criminal cause in the Circuit Court must be authenticated by a bill of exceptions to authorize the Supreme Court to consider it on a writ of error. The written agreement of counsel will not authorize its consideration.</p> <p>2. The mere recital in a motion for a new trial of a charge or charges to a jury, under the act of March 10th, 1883, (Chapter 3431 of the statutes,) regulating the practice in filing exceptions to charges, as have been erroneously given by a circuit judge, is not, where the motion is denied, evidence in the Supreme Court that any such charge was given.</p> <p>3. The purpose of the act of March 10th, 1883, (Chapter 3431,) was simply to enlarge the time for excepting to the charges to a jury.</p> <p>4. A charge to a jury cannot be made a part of the record of a cause except by a bill of exceptions, or by being signed, sealed and filed by the Circuit Judge, in accordance with the act of March 2nd, 1877, (sec. 368, p. 338 McClellan’s Digest).</p> <p>6. The practice as to excepting tocliarges and making them a part of the record reviewed.</p>

Judges: Raney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.