Hodge v. State
Citations
- 29 Fla. 500
Syllabus
<p>1. The oath or affidavits required by the act of March 11th, 1879 (sec. 41, p. 466, McClellan’s Digest), to satisfy the court that the testimony of a witness whose deposition it is desired to take under a commission is material and necessary to the defense of the accused, must present facts naturally and reasonably calculated to satisfy the judgment of the court that -such testimony is material and necessary to the defense. An affidavit of counsel stating that he is acquainted with the case of the defendant, and what is necessary for his defense, and verily believes that the testimony of a named witness, to whom interrogatories calling for his opinion as an expert and accompanying the motion for a commission are addressed, “ is necessary, material and important to the defendant,” is not sufficient,</p> <p>2. A plea of not guilty is a waiver of the right to plead in abatement in a criminal cause.</p> <p>3. If there can ever be a review by an appellate court of a ruling of a trial court refusing to permit the withdrawal of the general issue for the purpose of pleading in abatement of the indictment, it will not be done where the accused has waited twenty-one months after the finding of the indictment, and there has already been a trial on the merits, and the period barring a new indictment has elapsed.</p> <p>4. A charge to a jury cannot be made a part of the record except by a bill of exceptions, or by being signed, sealed and filed by the circuit judge, in accordance with the act of March 2d, 1887 (sec. 36, p. 338. McClellan’s Digest), and will not be reviewed by the appellate court when not made a part of the record.</p> <p>5. A verdict may be received and entered On Sunday, but it seems that judgment or sentence cannot be lawfully rendered on that day. The former proceeding is not ground for a new trial.</p> <p>. 6. The failure of the record to show that the judge asked á prisoner before pronouncing sentence upon him, if he had anything to say why the sentence
Judges: Raney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-01-15· cited 41×
- Ballard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-01-15· cited 38×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-01-15· cited 30×
- Clements v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 29×
- Blount v. FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-06-15· cited 25×
- Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1902-01-15· cited 18×
- Easterlin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 16×
- Cannon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-06-15· cited 16×
- Mercer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-05-05· cited 15×
- Keigans v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 12×
- Hanley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 11×
- Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-11-17· cited 4×
- Kirkpatrick v. City of Jacksonville ex rel. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-11-23
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Newton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1884-06-15· cited 52×
- Parrish v. Pensacola & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-06-15· cited 32×
- Huidekoper v. CottonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1834-09-15· cited 28×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-01-15· cited 27×
- Grady v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1852-02-15· cited 27×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-06-15· cited 13×
- Chapman v. State ex rel. ConerleyIndiana Supreme Court· 1839-05-24· cited 10×
- State v. . PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina· 1890-09-05· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.