English v. State
Citations
- 31 Fla. 340
Syllabus
<p>1. Where the county commissioners selected the number of two-hundred and forty-eight names instead of from two hundred and ninety to three hundred and ten, to constitute a list from which grand and petit jurors are to be drawn, the presumption is, in the absence of any showing that they abused the discretionary powers conferred upon them by the statute, that -they performed their duty.</p> <p>0. In ascertaining the meaning of the terms in a statute or a constitution, it is not only proper, but necessary, that recurrence-be had to the principles of the common law from which we derive the body of our municipal law.</p> <p>.3. The language of Section 10 of our Bill of Eights, that “no person shall be tried for a capital crime or other felony, unless on presentment or indictment by a grand jury, except as is otherwise provided in this Constitution, and except in cases of impeachment, and in cases in the militia when in active service in time of war, or which the State, with the consent of Congress, may keep, in time of peace,” was designed as a guaranty and protection of the citizen against a trial in the enumerated cases in the Circuit Courts of this State, except upon presentment or indictment by such a grand jury as was known at the common law,</p> <p>•4. A grand jury at the common law was composed of not less than twelve, nor more than twenty-three persons, and the concurrence of twelve of this number was absolutely essential to the finding of an indictment.</p> <p>5. The fifth section of the act of 1891, Chapter 4015, in so far as it provides that every grand jury shall consist of twelve persons, is constitutional; but the provision therein that the assent of eight of that number shall be necessary to the finding of indictments, is unconstitutional and void.</p> <p>16. The fact that a section or a portion of a section of an act is unconstitutional, does not necessarily render the whole act void. If the legislative purpose as expressed in the valid portion of an
Judges: Mabry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Singer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-02-13· cited 190×
- State ex rel. Lamar v. DillonSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-06-15· cited 78×
- Hayes v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 57×
- Wiggins & Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-06-15· cited 49×
- Small v. Sun Oil CompanySupreme Court of Florida· 1969-04-23· cited 33×
- Jones v. McClaughrySupreme Court of Iowa· 1915-02-26· cited 25×
- Buckman v. State ex rel. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-06-15· cited 23×
- Olive v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-06-15· cited 18×
- State ex rel. Buford v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-04-28· cited 16×
- Westlake v. MerrittSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-01-10· cited 15×
- State v. BarnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-02-18· cited 14×
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-01-15· cited 13×
- Lightfoot v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-04-10· cited 11×
- Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-01-15· cited 11×
- State v. BarnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-12-10· cited 6×
- Phillips v. BellSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-08-16· cited 6×
- State ex rel. Swearingen v. BullockSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-07-10· cited 1×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McKnight v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1843-02-28· cited 94×
- Gladden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1868-07-01· cited 53×
- Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-01-15· cited 33×
- State v. . BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1890-09-05· cited 31×
- Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1885-06-15· cited 31×
- Montague v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1880-01-15· cited 26×
- Alexander v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court· 1862-06-15· cited 25×
- State ex rel. Arpen v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida· 1883-01-15· cited 24×
- State ex rel. Moody v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida· 1884-01-15· cited 16×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-06-15· cited 13×
- Rainforth v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1871-09-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.