Flint v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a 3.850 motion is facially insufficient when the allegations thereof contain mere conclusions
• “Wo affirm the order denying t!' ’ ¡motion for now trial] because the motion failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 3.850, including the requirement that the motion be under oath.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Drew v. Department of Corrections
  Eleventh Circuit· 2002-07-18· cited 179×
• Reaves v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-11· cited 6×
• Wooden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-12· cited 6×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-06· cited 5×
• Mitchell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-26· cited 3×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-11· cited 1×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-25· cited 1×
• Byrd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-02

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-06-29· cited 45×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-28· cited 6×