E.D. California· 2/15/1985
Richards v. Nielsen Freight Lines
Citations
- 602 F. Supp. 1224
- 118 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2864
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- inferences are not 25 drawn out of the air, and it is the opposing party’s obligation to produce a factual predicate from 26 which the inference may be drawn
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karlton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
121 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Environmental Council of Sacramento v. SlaterE.D. California· 2000-11-06· cited 110×
- Newman v. Checkrite California, Inc.E.D. California· 1995-12-19· cited 72×
- Mid Valley Bank v. North Valley BankE.D. California· 1991-05-21· cited 44×
- Clark v. KizerE.D. California· 1990-10-03· cited 28×
- Costa v. National Action Financial ServicesE.D. California· 2007-12-19· cited 28×
- UMG Recordings, Inc. v. SinnottE.D. California· 2004-02-05· cited 27×
- Boland, Inc. v. Rolf C. Hagen (USA) Corp.E.D. California· 2010-02-04· cited 26×
- In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationC.D. California· 2013-10-07· cited 26×
- Pinder v. Employment Development DepartmentE.D. California· 2017-01-05· cited 25×
- Fitzgerald v. El Dorado CountyE.D. California· 2015-03-04· cited 24×
- Culley v. Lincare Inc.E.D. California· 2017-02-21· cited 23×
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Alia Corp.E.D. California· 2012-02-06· cited 23×
- Wilson v. Haria and Gogri Corp.E.D. California· 2007-03-22· cited 22×
- ITSI T v. Productions, Inc. v. California Authority of Racing FairsE.D. California· 1992-03-03· cited 20×
- Hubbard v. Twin Oaks Health & Rehabilitation CenterE.D. California· 2004-11-12· cited 20×
- Kaur v. City of LodiE.D. California· 2017-06-30· cited 19×
- Bhan v. NME Hospitals, Inc.E.D. California· 1987-09-16· cited 18×
- Castellano v. Access Premier Realty, Inc.E.D. California· 2016-04-20· cited 18×
- Rodriguez v. City of FresnoE.D. California· 2011-05-16· cited 17×
- Valdivia v. DavisE.D. California· 2002-06-14· cited 16×
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 7,008×
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 5,431×
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 2,703×
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 2,575×
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,261×
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,808×
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 1,608×
- Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 1,538×
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 843×
- Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 815×
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 776×
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court· 1948-05-03· cited 734×
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 694×
- United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court· 1941-02-03· cited 539×
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyNinth Circuit· 1978-11-08· cited 515×
- Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court· 1945-10-08· cited 422×
- Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.Supreme Court· 1954-01-11· cited 418×
- Connell Construction Co. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union No. 100Supreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 411×
- Sledge v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court· 1979-04-02· cited 373×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.