Rodriguez v. City of Fresno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because section 1692e(5) prohibits only threats, and because the complaint alleges an illegal act, not a threat, it does not come within section 1692e(5).”
• “To satisfy the FDCPA, the alleged act must at a minimum involve a misrepresentation that is ‘material.’ ”
• failure to return funds collected in satisfaction of judgment that was later set aside for lack of service did not violate FDCPA
• “[V]icarious liability may attach in the context of an attorney-client relationship where both the attorney and its client constitute ‘debt collectors’ under the FDCPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).