E.D. California· 3/4/2015
Fitzgerald v. El Dorado County
Citations
- 94 F. Supp. 3d 1155
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26679
- 126 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 694
- 2015 WL 966133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reassignment with pay decrease could 15 constitute adverse employment action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
- “the employee must be able to point to some 20 legal foundation for his suspicion—some statute, rule or regulation which may have been violated 21 by the conduct he disclosed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: England
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ross v. Cnty. of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-06-20· cited 38×
- Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.E.D. California· 2016-01-27· cited 28×
- DeFrenza v. Progressive Express Ins. Co.E.D. California· 2017-11-14· cited 2×
- Ross v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-06-10
- Ross v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-06-20
- Ross v. Cnty. of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-05-20
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court· 2009-01-21· cited 13,928×
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 6,903×
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,562×
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 5,431×
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,238×
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court· 2001-04-23· cited 3,456×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court· 2006-05-30· cited 2,871×
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 1,587×
- Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School DistrictSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 1,018×
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Ninth Circuit· 2000-11-20· cited 959×
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court· 2005-08-11· cited 838×
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court· 1872-04-22· cited 765×
- Onofre T. Serrano v. S.W. FrancisNinth Circuit· 2003-09-26· cited 649×
- Richards v. Nielsen Freight LinesE.D. California· 1985-02-15· cited 635×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.