Mid Valley Bank v. North Valley Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering party withdrawing admissions to pay reasonable cost of preparing opposition 22 to motion to withdraw admissions
• ordering party withdrawing admissions to pay reasonable cost of preparing opposition 22 to motion to withdraw admissions
• collecting cases and concluding at summary judgment that “waste oil containing CERCLA hazardous substances does not fall under the CERCLA petroleum exclusion”
• “[T]he [Court’s] discretion should not be exercised in terms of the defaulting party’s excuses, but in terms of the effect upon the litigation and prejudice to the resisting party.”
• “[A]lthough the motion is, as the parties acknowledge, directed to the sound discretion of the court, ... the discretion should not be exercised in terms of the defaulting party’s excuses, but in terms of the effect upon the litigation and prejudice to the resisting party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).