Richard McCarthy v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court “may review any evidence, such as affidavits and testimony, to resolve factual disputes concerning the existence of jurisdiction.”
• holding that a court “may review any evidence, such as affidavits and 17 testimony, to resolve factual disputes concerning the existence of jurisdiction”
• holding that a court 4 “may review any evidence, such as affidavits and testimony, to resolve factual disputes 5 concerning the existence of jurisdiction”
• holding that a court “may review any 20 evidence, such as affidavits and testimony, to resolve factual disputes concerning the existence of 21 jurisdiction”
• holding that a court “may review any evidence, such as affidavits and 23 testimony, to resolve factual disputes concerning the existence of jurisdiction”
• holding that a court “may review any evidence, such as affidavits and 16 testimony, to resolve factual disputes concerning the existence of jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).