Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Nichols

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that removal policy was not relevant where the state suit was no longer pending when the plaintiff filed the federal action
• stating that federal removal policy was not relevant where the state suit was no longer pending when the plaintiff filed the federal action
• “The Supreme Court has made it clear that the Colorado River doctrine is not a recognized form of abstention.”
• “The district court does not have discretion to abstain in a case that does not meet the abstention requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).