Skip to main content
· 11/3/1983

Floyd A. Wright v. United States of America, and Nathan Fletcher, Malcolm S. Segal and Does I Through Xxiii

Citations

  • 719 F.2d 1032
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the court “reads no exemptions into the FTCA beyond those provided”
  • refusing to limit the provision, other than the FTCA.” App. at exception to the context of a search, R-14. We conclude that the District Court seizure, or arrest
  • “The decision whether or not to prose- cute a given individual is a discretionary function for which the United States is immune from liability.”
  • \We have ... limited [Sec. 2680(a) ] to decisions made at a planning rather than an operational level.... The conduct of [the IRS agent] in implementing that decision ... is not immune as a discretionary function\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Canby, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.