Norris v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Hawaii Whistleblower’s Protection Act protects both unionized contract employees and at-will employees from being discharged in violation of public policy
• holding Federal Aviation Act and the federal aviation regulations may be source of public policy
• “A trial court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law, reviewable de novo.”
• “dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law, reviewable de novo”
• retaliatory discharge claim presents purely factual questions that do not require interpretation of collective bargaining agreement
• internal quotation marks, citation, and brackets in original omitted; brackets ed material added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).