Richard C. Pollard v. Autotote, Ltd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that forfeiture-for-competition provisions “restricts an employee’s ability to accept alternate employment”
• reasoning that forfeiture-for-competition provisions “restricts an employee’s ability to accept alternate employment”
• applying a reasonableness test to determine if a forfeiture-for-competition provision in a management incentive compensation plan is enforceable
• noting absence of controlling state law and predicting Delaware courts would evaluate forfeiture-for-competition provisions for reasonableness
• noting absence of controlling state law and predicting Delaware courts would evaluate forfeiture-for-competition provisions for reasonableness
• reasoning a forfeiture-for-competition provision “restricts an employee’s ability to accept alternative employment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).