Skip to main content
· 10/6/1988

Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jerry G. Blaker, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 859 F.2d 512
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a choice of law issue but concluding “[t]he parties’ silence waives any challenge” to the district court’s use of the forum’s substantive law
  • noting the mere fact that an employee has acquired skill and efficiency in the performance of the work as a result of his employment does not suffice to warrant the enforcement of a covenant on his part not to compete
  • “California is the leading jurisdiction on the other side [of the debate over the 9 Pactiv relies on a series of cases interpreting § 187(2)(a). (Dkt. 20 at 11
  • summarizing differing state approaches to this issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Easterbrook, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.