Walsh v. Bailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because meaning of joint account agreements was clear, it was error to admit extrinsic evidence regarding meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Richard C. Pollard v. Autotote, Ltd
  Third Circuit· 1989-04-26· cited 19×
• Walsh v. Bailey
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1964-01-24· cited 18×
• Bamdad Mechanic Co. v. United Technologies Corp.
  D. Delaware· 1984-05-02· cited 8×
• Farmers Bank of State of Delaware v. Howard
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1969-10-01· cited 7×
• In Re Matt
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-01-03· cited 6×
• In Re Estate of McCracken
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1966-05-20· cited 2×
• In THE MATTER OF McCALL
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1978-12-08· cited 1×
• Watson v. Washington Mutual Savings Bank
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-01-03· cited 1×
• In re Probate of the Last Will & Testament of McCall
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1978-12-08· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Furjanick Estate
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-11-09· cited 70×