D. New Jersey· 2/6/2018
Rich v. State
Citations
- 294 F. Supp. 3d 266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that an adverse employment action could not have been related to plaintiffs disability when defendants were not made aware of this disability until two years after termination
- denying motion for reconsideration because the “Court did not overlook” an argument, but “specifically referenced” it “in its . . . Opinion”
- framing third element as “[p]laintiff suffered an adverse employment action because of the handicap or disability”
- “[T]he [c]ourt finds [the plaintiff] did not suffer an adverse employment action because of her disability, but instead because of her performance.”
- “In considering a motion for summary judgment, a district court may not make credibility determinations.”
- “A court commits clear error of law “only if the record cannot support the findings that led to the ruling.”” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martinotti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 5,248×
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 3,107×
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictThird Circuit· 1999-08-18· cited 836×
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyThird Circuit· 1995-04-13· cited 713×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1997-07-14· cited 525×
- Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-14· cited 506×
- Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyThird Circuit· 1985-05-31· cited 476×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1999-03-30· cited 474×
- Curley v. KlemThird Circuit· 2002-08-02· cited 364×
- James West v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyThird Circuit· 1995-01-19· cited 326×
- Harold Katz and Ruth Katz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyThird Circuit· 1992-08-06· cited 303×
- Taylor v. MetzgerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-02-18· cited 268×
- Jayne G. Nathanson v. The Medical College of PennsylvaniaThird Circuit· 1991-03-04· cited 233×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1996-07-24· cited 224×
- Viscik v. Fowler Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-03-28· cited 216×
- Meral Smith v. Melvin H. EvansThird Circuit· 1988-11-04· cited 214×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.