Harold Katz and Ruth Katz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “although strict privity is not always an element of the private cause of action,” standing does not extend to “a plaintiff lacking any commercial dealings with the defendant”
• UTPCPL “unambiguously permits only persons who have purchased or leased goods or services to sue”
• passenger injured in car accident lacked standing to bring UTPCPL claim against insurer as intended beneficiary of driver’s insurance policy
• “[A] complete failure of proof concerning an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case necessarily renders all other facts immaterial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).