Court of Appeals of Texas· 12/29/1995
Rhodes v. State
Citations
- 913 S.W.2d 242
- 1995 Tex. App. LEXIS 3283
- 1995 WL 770269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that A [a]n occupant of an automobile is just as subject to an investigative detention as is a pedestrian @
- recognizing that “[a]n occupant of an automobile is just as subject to an investigative detention as is a pedestrian”
- recognizing “[a]n occupant of an automobile is just as subject to an investigative detention as is a pedestrian”
- recognizing “[a]n occupant of an automobile is just as suspect to an investigative detention as is a pedestrian”
- recognizing \[a]n occupant of an automobile is just as suspect to an investigative detention as is a pedestrian\
- holding defendant was only temporarily detained even though officer testified he was under arrest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Day, Brigham, Holman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-04-30· cited 471×
- Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-05-15· cited 205×
- Pipkin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-08-21· cited 117×
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-06-17· cited 90×
- Akins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-08-31· cited 84×
- Alford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-07-20· cited 77×
- Kibble v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-05-11· cited 72×
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-17· cited 65×
- Guy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-03-10· cited 61×
- Zayas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1998-09-16· cited 60×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-05-25· cited 45×
- State v. MooreTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-08-10· cited 45×
- Morris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-28· cited 41×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1997-07-17· cited 39×
- Ingram v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2003-10-02· cited 37×
- McCraw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-08-21· cited 27×
- Brown v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2008-01-16· cited 25×
- Johnson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-08-18· cited 22×
- Stone v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-10-15· cited 17×
- Blevins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-23· cited 17×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 16,485×
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-21· cited 2,504×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- Geesa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-06· cited 2,157×
- Johnson v. GlickSecond Circuit· 1973-06-29· cited 1,567×
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-16· cited 1,540×
- Heitman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-26· cited 1,035×
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-23· cited 1,003×
- Narvaiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-23· cited 944×
- Amores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-09-18· cited 529×
- Emery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-05-11· cited 456×
- Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-29· cited 429×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-10-26· cited 295×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.