Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 7/15/2010

Rhoades v. Henry

Citations

  • 611 F.3d 1133
  • 2010 D.A.R. 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “violations of state law are not cognizable on federal habeas review’
  • stating that “violations of state law are not cognizable on federal habeas review”
  • considering argument that sentencing judge violated state 19 law and finding “violations of state law are not cognizable on federal 20 habeas review”
  • affirming the constitutionality of Idaho Code section 19-2719, provided new counsel are appointed to pursue the ineffective assistance of counsel claims, as addressed in Hoffman v. Arave, 236 F.3d 523 (9th Cir.2001)
  • violations of state 19 sentencing law are not cognizable on federal habeas review
  • violations of state 19 sentencing law are not cognizable on federal habeas review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rymer, Gould, Bybee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.