Ninth Circuit· 7/15/2010
Rhoades v. Henry
Citations
- 611 F.3d 1133
- 2010 D.A.R. 11
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “violations of state law are not cognizable on federal habeas review’
- stating that “violations of state law are not cognizable on federal habeas review”
- considering argument that sentencing judge violated state 19 law and finding “violations of state law are not cognizable on federal 20 habeas review”
- affirming the constitutionality of Idaho Code section 19-2719, provided new counsel are appointed to pursue the ineffective assistance of counsel claims, as addressed in Hoffman v. Arave, 236 F.3d 523 (9th Cir.2001)
- violations of state 19 sentencing law are not cognizable on federal habeas review
- violations of state 19 sentencing law are not cognizable on federal habeas review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rymer, Gould, Bybee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court· 2018-04-11· cited 74×
- Earp v. CullenNinth Circuit· 2010-10-19· cited 44×
- Joe Smith v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2016-05-26· cited 36×
- Gerald Pizzuto, Jr. v. Randy BladesNinth Circuit· 2013-09-09· cited 13×
- Levee, Theodore FloydTexas Supreme Court· 2015-01-23
- Row v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2025-09-04
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court· 2000-04-26· cited 41,291×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 4,309×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 2,419×
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,349×
- Lewis v. JeffersSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,972×
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,501×
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 1,233×
- Porter v. McCollumSupreme Court· 2009-11-30· cited 915×
- Wong v. BelmontesSupreme Court· 2009-11-16· cited 732×
- Kennedy v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2008-06-25· cited 620×
- Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 416×
- Clarence Ray Allen v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of the California State Prison at San QuentinNinth Circuit· 2005-01-24· cited 183×
- Victor Eugene Rios v. Teresa Rocha, WardenNinth Circuit· 2002-07-31· cited 164×
- Maxwell Hoffman v. A.J. Arave, WardenNinth Circuit· 2001-01-03· cited 94×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.