Venable v. Internet Auto Rent & Sales, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that to establish she engaged in a protected activity, the employee needed to not only present evidence of the employer’s misconduct, but also of her own conduct in furtherance of the identified public policy
• explaining that to establish she engaged in a protected activity, the employee needed to not only present evidence of the employer’s misconduct, but also of her own conduct in furtherance of the identified public policy
• “In order to properly state a claim under the public policy exception, a plaintiff must specifically identify the public policy in question[.]”
• “In order to properly state a claim under the public policy exception, a plaintiff must specifically identify the public policy in question[.]”
• “Even if Venable had tied a specific bullet point of alleged misconduct to a specific provision of the ICPA, she would need to have presented competent evidence to show that the employer violated the public policy and that she was terminated for engaging in protected activity.”
• “Even if Venable had tied a specific bullet point of alleged misconduct to a specific provision of the ICPA, she would need to have presented competent evidence to show that the employer violated the public policy and that she was terminated for engaging in protected activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).