Skip to main content
· 9/25/1989

Guajardo v. State

Citations

  • 544 N.E.2d 174
  • 1989 Ind. App. LEXIS 917
  • 1989 WL 112214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reversal was not required where defendant had already served out his sentence because the error had been mooted and the denial of counsel at sentencing did not affect the validity of the underlying conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrard, Chezem, Staton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.