Skip to main content

Renfro v. State

Citations

  • 118 So. 3d 560
  • 2013 WL 1459466
  • 2013 Miss. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding jury “was entitled to draw a reasonable inference” that the defendant had a motive to commit the crime and in fact did commit the crime
  • “‘[I]nconsistencies in witnesses’ testimony do not require the jury to reject the entire testimony’ of a witness.” (quoting Duncan v. State, 939 So. 2d 772, 782 (Miss. 2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler, Coleman, Dickinson, King, Kitchens, Lamar, Pierce, Randolph, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.