Skip to main content
· 8/17/2000

Amiker v. Drugs for Less, Inc.

Citations

  • 796 So. 2d 942
  • 2000 WL 1161055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a motion for a new trial is addressed to the discretion of the court and should be granted only “in exceptional cases in which the evidence preponderates heavily against the verdict.”
  • holding that a motion for a new trial is addressed to the discretion of the court and should be granted only “in exceptional cases in which the evidence preponderates heavily against the verdict.”
  • “When this Court reviews a decision that is within the trial court’s discretion, it first asks if the court below applied the correct legal standard.”
  • new trial warranted where defendant “failed to comply with orders regarding discovery”
  • successor judge vacated trial judge’s order prior to appellate court’s involvement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.