Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 512 So. 2d 666

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where nudity, in the totality of the circumstances, was an indicator of rape despite the victim’s inability to communicate anything directly to the court
  • because of defendant’s lack of objection to comments in closing argument, the issue was procedurally barred and need not be considered
  • absence of foreman’s signature procedural defect waived by defendant’s failure to demur to indictment
  • our law presumes that the jury does as it is told
  • our law presumes that the jury does as it is told

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, P.J., and Robertson and Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.