Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 129 Miss. 332
  • 92 So. 225

Syllabus

<p>Criminal Law. Supreme court will not disturb verdict based on competent evidence unless the testimony is unreasonable or highly improbable.</p> <p>This court will not disturb the finding of fact by a jury when based upon convincing competent evidence except in exceedingly rare cases, where the testimony is unreasonable, and so highly improbable as to raise extreme doubt, and become repulsive to the reasoning of an ordinary mind,.</p>

Judges: Holden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.