Rencher/Sundown LLC v. Pearson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding the Respondent attorney fees because the Appellant failed to provide documentation to support its contention that the district court erred
• noting missing portions of record are presumed to support trial court’s action
• “the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ellis v. Ellis
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2020-06-09· cited 11×
• Walker v. Meyer
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2021-11-17· cited 2×
• Groveland Water and Sewer Dist v. City of Blackfoot
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2022-03-03
• Dickenson v. Benewah County
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-06-07
• Skehan v. ISP
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2024-01-03

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rutter v. McLaughlin
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1980-05-23· cited 90×
• Gibson v. Ada County
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2003-04-09· cited 37×
• Sammis v. Magnetek, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1997-06-05· cited 35×
• Belk v. Martin
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2001-12-28· cited 32×
• Martin v. Hoblit
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1999-08-24· cited 27×
• Christina J. Greenfield v. Ian D. Smith
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2017-06-06· cited 21×
• Telford v. Mart Produce, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1998-01-16· cited 17×
• Elliott v. Verska
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2012-01-05· cited 16×
• Bird v. Bidwell
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-05-29· cited 14×
• Harrison v. Board of Professional Discipline of the Idaho State Board of Medicine
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2008-01-29· cited 9×
• Hansen v. White
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2018-06-08· cited 9×

Other cases named Rencher/Sundown LLC v. Pearson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Rencher/Sundown LLC v. Pearson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2019-11-29