Skip to main content
· 5/23/1980

Rutter v. McLaughlin

Citations

  • 612 P.2d 135
  • 101 Idaho 292
  • 1980 Ida. LEXIS 463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘Where an incomplete record is presented to this Court, the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
  • “the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
  • “the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
  • “Where an incomplete record is presented to this Court, the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
  • Court held that error will not be presumed on appeal but must be affirmatively shown on the record by appellant, “[w]here an incomplete record is presented to this Court the missing portions of that record are presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
  • Court held that error will not be presumed on appeal but must be affirmatively shown on the record by appellant, \[w]here an incomplete record is presented to this Court the missing portions of that record are presumed to support the action of the trial court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bakes, Donaldson, Shepard, Dunlap, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.