· 5/23/1980
Rutter v. McLaughlin
Citations
- 612 P.2d 135
- 101 Idaho 292
- 1980 Ida. LEXIS 463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘Where an incomplete record is presented to this Court, the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
- “the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
- “the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
- “Where an incomplete record is presented to this Court, the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
- Court held that error will not be presumed on appeal but must be affirmatively shown on the record by appellant, “[w]here an incomplete record is presented to this Court the missing portions of that record are presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
- Court held that error will not be presumed on appeal but must be affirmatively shown on the record by appellant, \[w]here an incomplete record is presented to this Court the missing portions of that record are presumed to support the action of the trial court.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bakes, Donaldson, Shepard, Dunlap, Walters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.