Rutter v. McLaughlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘Where an incomplete record is presented to this Court, the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
• “the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
• “the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
• “Where an incomplete record is presented to this Court, the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
• Court held that error will not be presumed on appeal but must be affirmatively shown on the record by appellant, “[w]here an incomplete record is presented to this Court the missing portions of that record are presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
• Court held that error will not be presumed on appeal but must be affirmatively shown on the record by appellant, \[w]here an incomplete record is presented to this Court the missing portions of that record are presumed to support the action of the trial court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Shawver v. Huckleberry Estates, L.L.C.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2004-04-29· cited 98×
• Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine Insurance
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 95×
• Farnsworth v. Dairymen's Creamery Ass'n
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1994-06-01· cited 74×
• DeLancey v. DeLancey
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1986-02-06· cited 57×
• Farmers National Bank v. Shirey
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1994-06-20· cited 57×
• Kugler v. Drown
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-02-04· cited 55×
• International Engineering Co. v. Daum Industries, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 45×
• Quincy v. JOINT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 41, ETC.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1981-12-01· cited 44×
• Latham v. Garner
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-12-28· cited 43×
• Pinehaven Planning Board v. Brooks
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2003-02-27· cited 43×
• State v. Willoughby
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-05-12· cited 42×
• Magic Valley Radiology Associates v. Professional Business Services, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1991-04-08· cited 42×
• Loomis, Inc. v. Cudahy
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-10-01· cited 37×
• Carpenter v. Double R Cattle Co., Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1985-05-21· cited 36×
• Kozlowski v. Rush
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1992-03-20· cited 34×
• Turcott v. Estate of Bates
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2019-06-07· cited 28×
• Lunders v. Estate of Snyder
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1998-07-01· cited 27×
• Post v. Murphy
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1994-04-04· cited 23×
• Murr v. Selag Corp.
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1987-12-02· cited 20×
• Win of Michigan, Inc. v. Yreka United, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2002-06-07· cited 18×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cullison v. City of Peoria
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-09-15· cited 71×
• Werry v. Phillips Petroleum Company
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1975-09-25· cited 60×
• Dawson v. Mead
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1976-12-14· cited 53×
• Glenn Dick Equipment Co. v. Galey Construction, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1975-10-08· cited 48×
• Stewart v. Arrington Construction Company
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1968-11-08· cited 43×
• Minidoka County Ex Rel. Detweiler Bros. v. Krieger
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1965-03-23· cited 33×
• Transamerica Leasing Corp. v. Van's Realty Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1967-05-10· cited 28×
• Williams v. INSURAMCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
  Montana Supreme Court· 1967-12-01· cited 25×