Elliott v. Verska

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “obviously, Defendants could easily have been served within the six-month period had Plaintiff exercised due diligence”
• affirming the trial court’s finding that the plaintiff did not meet the burden to establish that the party was an authorized agent for service of process for the defendant
• “In fact, we held in Campbell that receiving a copy of the summons and complaint in the mail, which would obviously meet the requirements of due process, did not constitute service of the summons and complaint.” (citing Campbell v. Reagan, 144 Idaho 254, 159 P.3d 891 (2007))
• “In fact, we held in Campbell that receiving a copy of the summons and complaint in the mail, which would obviously meet the requirements of due process, did not constitute service of the summons and complaint.” (citing Campbell v. Reagan, 144 Idaho 254, 159 P.3d 891 (2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).