Skip to main content
· 5/29/2009

Bird v. Bidwell

Citations

  • 209 P.3d 647
  • 147 Idaho 350
  • 2009 Ida. LEXIS 88

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because the intent to grant or reserve the easement is a necessary element, there is no logical reason to base the decision solely upon the grantor’s presumed intent from prior use and to exclude other relevant evidence of that 19 intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.