Eleventh Circuit· 3/11/2010
Rehberg v. Paulk
Citations
- 611 F.3d 828
- 2010 WL 2788199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \the age of a property alone is not a sufficient factual basis to support a finding that it contained lead-based paint.” (quoting Hamilton v. Kirson
- concluding in a habeas context that \[w]hat we held in Ristaino [ v. Ross
- holding that defendant lacked a legitimate expectation of privacy in phone and fax numbers dialed
- stating that prosecutors are immune for appearances in judicial proceedings, “including prosecutorial conduct before grand juries”
- dismissing a stigma-plus claim where the complaint did not allege that the defendant’s media statements \caused\ the plaintiff’s indict- ments and arrest
- concluding intracorporate conspiracy doctrine barred § 1983 conspiracy claim against a county employee
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carnes, Hull, Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioNinth Circuit· 2012-08-29· cited 4,653×
- Grider v. City of Auburn, Ala.Eleventh Circuit· 2010-09-07· cited 480×
- David Evans v. Patrick BakerFourth Circuit· 2012-12-17· cited 428×
- Cindy Laine Franklin v. Chris CurryEleventh Circuit· 2013-12-23· cited 182×
- In re the United StatesFifth Circuit· 2013-07-30· cited 155×
- Shawn Alvin Tracey v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-10-16· cited 53×
- State v. KnutsonNebraska Supreme Court· 2014-08-15· cited 45×
- United States v. Dontavious M. BlakeEleventh Circuit· 2017-08-21· cited 44×
- Rawlings v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-10-28· cited 41×
- Gibbons v. McBrideS.D. Georgia· 2015-08-21· cited 33×
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2015-04-17· cited 29×
- Smith v. Smith (In re Smith)M.D. Georgia· 2013-04-02· cited 29×
- State v. MarinelloLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2010-10-06· cited 17×
- Jones v. BucknerN.D. Alabama· 2013-08-09· cited 15×
- United States v. KeithD. Massachusetts· 2013-11-05· cited 14×
- Kelley v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-15· cited 13×
- Corbett v. Transportation Security AdministrationS.D. Florida· 2012-11-16· cited 12×
- ATHEISTS OF FLORIDA v. City of Lakeland, Fla.M.D. Florida· 2011-03-15· cited 10×
- Watson v. EdelenN.D. Florida· 2015-01-05· cited 10×
- Lyttle v. United StatesM.D. Georgia· 2012-03-31· cited 10×
Cites
61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court· 2009-01-21· cited 13,928×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 7,274×
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 7,028×
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 4,957×
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 4,836×
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,725×
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 2,450×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court· 1983-03-07· cited 2,053×
- Burns v. ReedSupreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 1,988×
- Hartman v. MooreSupreme Court· 2006-04-26· cited 1,622×
- Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.Eleventh Circuit· 2004-09-24· cited 1,498×
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court· 1999-02-23· cited 1,221×
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,197×
- Kalina v. FletcherSupreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,173×
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court· 1987-03-31· cited 1,069×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.