Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 3/11/2010

Rehberg v. Paulk

Citations

  • 611 F.3d 828
  • 2010 WL 2788199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the age of a property alone is not a sufficient factual basis to support a finding that it contained lead-based paint.” (quoting Hamilton v. Kirson
  • concluding in a habeas context that \[w]hat we held in Ristaino [ v. Ross
  • holding that defendant lacked a legitimate expectation of privacy in phone and fax numbers dialed
  • stating that prosecutors are immune for appearances in judicial proceedings, “including prosecutorial conduct before grand juries”
  • dismissing a stigma-plus claim where the complaint did not allege that the defendant’s media statements \caused\ the plaintiff’s indict- ments and arrest
  • concluding intracorporate conspiracy doctrine barred § 1983 conspiracy claim against a county employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Hull, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.