Cindy Laine Franklin v. Chris Curry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a court disregards “conclusory allegations” because they “fail to apprise defendants of the factual basis of the plaintiff’s claims”
• explaining that “a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action” is conclusory
• explaining that these types of statements are \conclusory legal allegations\ that \carry no weight\
• noting that courts “afford no presumption of truth to legal conclusions”
• requiring assertions of policies that were in place, should have been in place, or how policies would’ve prevented [the constitutional violation]” to defeat qualified immunity
• using the “more than gross negligence” formulation of the deliberate- indifference standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).