King v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that VA has duty to consider any presumption that may be applicable to a veteran’s claim and, in the absence of “clear evidence” to the contrary, is presumed to have done so
• absent “clear evidence” that an evidentiary assumption was not properly applied, the Court concluded that the relevant law and evidence had been considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).