Nevada Supreme Court· 6/14/1979

Reese v. State

Citations

596 P.2d 212
95 Nev. 419
1979 Nev. LEXIS 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the district court committed no abuse of discretion in precluding the testimony of the defendant’s parents offered on the day of trial
when jurors and witness conversed on subject unrelated to matter before the jury, court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to dismiss the jury and declare a mistrial
reference made to “previous contacts” with a police officer, without any indication of the nature of the contacts or that the accused had committed any previous crime, a situation much different from the present reference to “mug shots” of appellant being located in criminal record files
reference made to \previous contacts\ with a police officer, without any indication of the nature of the contacts or that the accused had committed any previous crime, a situation much different from the present reference to \mug shots\ of appellant being located in criminal record files

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mowbray, Thompson, Gunderson, Manoukian, Batjer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.