Skip to main content
· 5/6/1964

State v. Plas

Citations

  • 391 P.2d 867
  • 80 Nev. 251
  • 1964 Nev. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fact that defendant was in custody and detained for questioning did not negate validity of his consent to search vehicle
  • fact that defendant was in custody and detained for questioning did not negate validity of his consent to search vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNamee, Badt, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.