State v. Roden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well settled that a party who learns of the misconduct of a juror during the trial may not keep silent and take advantage of it in the event of an adverse verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Williams
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 134×
• Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-06-14· cited 48×
• State v. Durfee
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-13· cited 36×
• Johnson v. Kolovos
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1960-10-12· cited 25×
• Reese v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-06-14· cited 22×
• State v. Paquin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-01-17· cited 18×
• State v. Bartlett
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1979-09-10· cited 17×
• State v. Goodale
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1972-05-24· cited 13×
• State v. Hedrick
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-12-31· cited 5×
• State v. Hollingsworth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-02-19· cited 4×
• State v. Sikes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-05-17· cited 4×
• State v. Mapel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-11-23· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Edvalson v. Swick
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1951-01-24· cited 26×
• Osmun v. Winters
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1896-11-09· cited 17×
• Tucker v. Salem Flouring Mills Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1885-04-27· cited 10×