Skip to main content

Ratliff v. State

Citations

  • 320 S.W.3d 857
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 5629
  • 2010 WL 2813527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a defendant’s “failure to object at the time [a detective] specifically described the physical evidence and explained how he found that evidence forfeited any error associated with [the defendant’s] objection to the State’s later introduction of the evidence”
  • explaining that a defendant’s “failure to object at the time [a detective] specifically described the physical evidence and explained how he found that evidence forfeited any error 12 associated with [the defendant’s] objection to the State’s later introduction of the evidence”
  • “[A]ppellant’s failure to object at the time [officer] specifically described the physical evidence and explained how he found that evidence forfeited any error associated with his objection to the State’s later introduction of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Dauphinot, McCoy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.