Mauldin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘The purpose of [the CINA statute] is to protect children—not wait for their injury.’” (alteration in original) (quoting In re William B., 73 Md. App. 68, 77–78 (1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).