Lg Display Co., Ltd v. Obayashi Seikou Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judgment is repugnant to U.S. policy, such that it may be denied comity, only if it tends to undermine the public interest, the public confidence in the administration of the law, or security for individual rights of personal liberty or of private property
• explaining that a foreign judgment being “repugnant to public policy” is a “high standard, and infrequently met”
• finding dismissal of certain claims premature and denying contingent motion to dismiss without prejudice
• rejecting argument for in personam jurisdiction under § 13-423(a)(4) based on foreign defendants’ submission of patent applications to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; “[s]tated simply, a party’s contacts with government agencies do not enter the jurisdictional calculus”
• “Here, LG . . . makes no mention of conspiracy in its complaint, and it is doubtful whether the facts alleged therein might support the inference that a conspiracy existed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).