Supreme Court· 10/24/1972
Essling v. Brubacher
Citations
- 409 U.S. 950
- 93 S. Ct. 273
- 34 L. Ed. 2d 221
- 1972 U.S. LEXIS 967
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting and rejecting the contention that the act of state doctrine “has been sapped of its vitality and rationale” by the “Sabbatino Amendment,” 22 U.S.C. § 2370(e)(2)
- defamation claim required determination of legality of loan allegedly arranged by plaintiff head of state
- an “inordinate delay” in State post-conviction process may render the State remedy ineffective
- Noerr-Pennington does not protect applications to governments of other nations
- Noerr-Pennington does not protect applications to governments of other nations
- rationale of Noerr-Pennington inapplicable to acts in foreign countries
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. MarcosNinth Circuit· 1988-12-02· cited 279×
- Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of AmericaNinth Circuit· 1976-12-27· cited 165×
- Jesse Joseph Deters v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Dept. Of Criminal Justice Institution DivisionFifth Circuit· 1993-03-11· cited 134×
- Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum CorporationThird Circuit· 1979-04-03· cited 133×
- Coastal States Marketing, Inc. And Valero Energy Corporation, Cross-Appellees v. Nelson Bunker Hunt, Cross-AppellantsFifth Circuit· 1983-01-14· cited 131×
- Loftin & Woodard, Inc. v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1978-08-09· cited 114×
- Nelson Bunker Hunt v. Mobil Oil CorporationSecond Circuit· 1977-01-12· cited 106×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1977-03-03· cited 72×
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-10-10· cited 68×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-05-13· cited 63×
- Timberlane Lumber Company v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings AssociationNinth Circuit· 1984-12-27· cited 62×
- Sharon v. Time, Inc.S.D. New York· 1984-11-12· cited 56×
- Rasoulzadeh v. Associated PressS.D. New York· 1983-10-31· cited 50×
- International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers v. OpecNinth Circuit· 1981-08-24· cited 45×
- Clayco Petroleum Corporation and Bruce Clayman v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Occidental of Umm Al Qaywayn, Inc., and Armand HammerNinth Circuit· 1983-08-02· cited 44×
- United States Dental Institute v. American Association of OrthodontistsN.D. Illinois· 1975-06-06· cited 38×
- O.N.E. Shipping Ltd. v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A., Andino Chemical Shipping, Inc., and Maritima Transligra, S.A.Second Circuit· 1987-10-01· cited 35×
- Caribe Trailer Systems, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 1979-04-19· cited 35×
- Hunt v. Mobil Oil CorporationS.D. New York· 1975-11-05· cited 35×
- Dominicus Americana Bohio v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.S.D. New York· 1979-07-11· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.