Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 10/24/1972

Essling v. Brubacher

Citations

  • 409 U.S. 950
  • 93 S. Ct. 273
  • 34 L. Ed. 2d 221
  • 1972 U.S. LEXIS 967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting and rejecting the contention that the act of state doctrine “has been sapped of its vitality and rationale” by the “Sabbatino Amendment,” 22 U.S.C. § 2370(e)(2)
  • defamation claim required determination of legality of loan allegedly arranged by plaintiff head of state
  • an “inordinate delay” in State post-conviction process may render the State remedy ineffective
  • Noerr-Pennington does not protect applications to governments of other nations
  • Noerr-Pennington does not protect applications to governments of other nations
  • rationale of Noerr-Pennington inapplicable to acts in foreign countries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.