Randolph v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in the context of deciding whether plaintiffs could assert a common law abusive discharge claim, that the MWHL “only provide[d] a criminal penalty for violation [of] the anti-retaliatory provision,” not a civil remedy
• “Plaintiffs have properly alleged that they engaged in an activity protected by the FLSA by filing a good-faith complaint with [the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).