Randolph v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in the context of deciding whether plaintiffs could assert a common law abusive discharge claim, that the MWHL “only provide[d] a criminal penalty for violation [of] the anti-retaliatory provision,” not a civil remedy
• “Plaintiffs have properly alleged that they engaged in an activity protected by the FLSA by filing a good-faith complaint with [the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Brown v. Rapid Response Delivery, Inc.
  D. Maryland· 2016-12-28· cited 2×

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.
  Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
• Albright v. Oliver
  Supreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 7,028×
• Francis v. Giacomelli
  Fourth Circuit· 2009-12-02· cited 1,790×
• Edwards v. City of Goldsboro
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-05-14· cited 1,105×
• Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River Company
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-05-17· cited 986×
• UNITED BLACK FIREFIGHTERS OF NORFOLK Et Al., Appellants, v. Julian F. HIRST Et Al., Appellees
  Fourth Circuit· 1979-08-29· cited 605×
• Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1960-01-18· cited 515×
• Adler v. American Standard Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-07-16· cited 337×
• Darveau v. Detecon, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 2008-01-31· cited 159×
• Makovi v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-07-26· cited 133×
• Wholey v. Roebuck
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-06-19· cited 85×
• Chappell v. Southern Maryland Hospital, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-09-05· cited 78×
• Peter Ball v. Memphis Bar-B-Q Company, Incorporated, Secretary of Labor, Amicus Curiae
  Fourth Circuit· 2000-09-14· cited 69×
• Ewing v. Koppers Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-07· cited 67×
• Tombrello v. USX Corp.
  N.D. Alabama· 1991-04-26· cited 38×
• King v. Marriott International, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-27· cited 27×
• United States v. Daniel Ruacho
  Eighth Circuit· 2014-03-11· cited 12×
• Morgan v. Future Ford Sales
  D. Delaware· 1993-08-26· cited 5×