Ninth Circuit· 7/11/2014

Randall Amado v. Terri Gonzalez

Citations

758 F.3d 1119
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13710
2014 WL 3377340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the requirement of due diligence is contrary to federal law as clearly established by the Supreme Court and unsound public policy
recognizing that, under Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 154 (1972), the Government “must disclose all material impeachment evidence” concerning prosecution witnesses, including “evidence relating to cooperation agreements”
holding that Brady evidence was material where other evidence was weak
stating that imposing a due diligence requirement on defense counsel would “flip” the prosecutor’s obligation to disclose favorable evidence
overruling a due diligence requirement by the defense and reasoning that prosecutors have a broad duty and obligation in disclosure
overruling a due diligence requirement by the defense and reasoning that prosecutors have a broad duty and obligation in disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Rawlinson, Hellerstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Randall Amado v. Terri Gonzalez

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.