Stephen Comstock v. Stefanie Humphries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “persons on parole are also ‘in custody’ for purposes of § 2254”
• reversing conviction where lack of direct evidence combined with suppression of a witness’s “expressed doubts and recollections” “substantially diminished, if not defeated” the state’s ability to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
• “arguments in briefs are not 5] evidence”
• “arguments in briefs are not evidence”
• “arguments in briefs are not evidence”
• “arguments in briefs are not evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).