Ninth Circuit· 12/29/2014

Eric Mann v. Charles Ryan

Citations

774 F.3d 1203
2014 WL 7345864
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Because the state post-conviction court did not reach the deficiency prong of the Strickland analysis, our review of this prong is not circumscribed by AEDPA.”
“Because the state post-conviction court did not reach the deficiency prong of the Strickland analysis, our review of this prong is not circumscribed by AEDPA.”
“[C]ounsel has an obligation at the penalty phase to conduct a thorough investigation of the defendant’s background.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
“[Cjounsel has an obligation at the penalty phase to conduct a thorough investigation of the defendant’s background.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
“Because the state post-conviction court did not reach the deficiency prong of the Strickland analysis, our review of this prong is not circumscribed by AEDPA.”
“[C]ounsel has an obligation at the penalty phase to conduct a thorough investigation of the defendant’s background.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alex, Kozinski, Reinhardt, Sidney, Stephen, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.