Supreme Court· 11/28/2005
Bradshaw v. Richey
Citations
- 546 U.S. 74
- 126 S. Ct. 602
- 163 L. Ed. 2d 407
- 2005 U.S. LEXIS 9033
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an 8 || interpretation of state law by a state court “binds a federal court sitting in habeas corpus.”
- holding that a state court’s interpretation of state law binds a federal court sitting 10 in habeas corpus
- recognizing that a federal habeas court is bound by a state appellate court’s determination of issues of state law
- recognizing that a federal habeas court is bound by a state appellate court’s determination of issues of state law
- holding that state court interpretation of state law issue is 22 binding on federal habeas court
- holding that failure to credit Ohio Supreme Court’s pro- nouncement that the doctrine of transferred intent applied to felony murder by reaching the opposite conclusion was error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
167 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court· 2011-04-04· cited 5,931×
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-13· cited 423×
- Joel Dufresne v. Carmen PalmerSixth Circuit· 2017-11-22· cited 276×
- Royce Brown v. John F. CarawaySeventh Circuit· 2013-05-10· cited 263×
- Clark v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 249×
- Dwayne Woods v. Stephen SinclairNinth Circuit· 2014-08-25· cited 225×
- James Earl Slaughter, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Phil Parker, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 2006-06-13· cited 140×
- Sistrunk v. RozumThird Circuit· 2012-03-20· cited 134×
- Railey v. WebbSixth Circuit· 2008-08-26· cited 114×
- Kevin Harold v. Christopher SteelSeventh Circuit· 2014-12-11· cited 111×
- Jamal Thomas v. George StephensonSixth Circuit· 2018-08-06· cited 108×
- People v. ShabazzCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-03-27· cited 104×
- Williams v. TrammellTenth Circuit· 2015-04-10· cited 103×
- Randall Amado v. Terri GonzalezNinth Circuit· 2014-07-11· cited 102×
- Loggins v. ThomasEleventh Circuit· 2011-09-07· cited 101×
- Medley v. RunnelsNinth Circuit· 2007-11-01· cited 95×
- Richey v. BradshawSixth Circuit· 2007-08-10· cited 86×
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-15· cited 86×
- Ferensic v. BirkettSixth Circuit· 2007-09-04· cited 72×
- Heard v. AddisonTenth Circuit· 2013-09-04· cited 70×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court· 1991-12-04· cited 8,719×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 2,149×
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 1,620×
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-02· cited 1,039×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 846×
- State v. RicheyOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-12· cited 380×
- Holland v. JacksonSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 350×
- State v. SowellOhio Supreme Court· 1988-11-16· cited 136×
- Kenneth T. Richey v. Betty Mitchell, WardenSixth Circuit· 2005-01-25· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.