Bradshaw v. Richey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an 8 || interpretation of state law by a state court “binds a federal court sitting in habeas corpus.”
• holding that a state court’s interpretation of state law binds a federal court sitting 10 in habeas corpus
• recognizing that a federal habeas court is bound by a state appellate court’s determination of issues of state law
• recognizing that a federal habeas court is bound by a state appellate court’s determination of issues of state law
• holding that state court interpretation of state law issue is 22 binding on federal habeas court
• holding that failure to credit Ohio Supreme Court’s pro- nouncement that the doctrine of transferred intent applied to felony murder by reaching the opposite conclusion was error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).