Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/26/2004
Matthews v. State
Citations
- 596 S.E.2d 49
- 358 S.C. 456
- 2004 S.C. LEXIS 100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expanding the reasonable probability standard as the burden for proving both the deficiency of counsel and the prejudice prongs
- expanding the reasonable probability standard as the burden for proving both the deficiency of counsel and the prejudice prongs
- “Due process prohibits the conviction of an incompetent defendant, and this right may not be waived by a guilty plea.” (emphasis added)
- “In order to find that petitioner’s trial counsel was ineffective for refusing to request a Blair[ 1 ] hearing on petitioner’s competency to stand trial, petitioner must show that counsel was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced the outcome of petitioner’s proceedings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-03-17· cited 398×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-12-21· cited 10×
- Garren v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-04-25· cited 5×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-01-05· cited 4×
- Ramirez v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-07-29· cited 2×
- United States v. McNultyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2024-04-12
- United States v. HAYSNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2025-12-19
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.