Skip to main content

Ramirez v. State

Citations

  • 104 S.W.3d 549
  • 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 79
  • 2003 WL 1970350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding document submitted to trial court after it lost jurisdiction to take evidence was not part of record
  • concluding document submitted to trial court after it lost jurisdiction to take evidence was not part of record
  • providing that the appellate record cannot be supplemented with evidence not introduced during trial
  • providing that appellate record cannot be supplemented with evidence not presented to trial court
  • providing that the appellate record cannot be supplemented with evidence not introduced during trial
  • holding trial court’s general jurisdiction expired upon filing of notice of appeal and document introduced at subsequent indigency hearing could not be considered by appellate court for purposes other than indigency determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Meyers, Price, Keasler, Heryey, Holcomb, Cochran, Womack, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.